The Pros and Cons of Family Loan Agreements

A family loan agreement lets someone in your family lend you money for a deposit or purchase costs without triggering the servicing questions that come with a standard gift.

The structure sounds simple enough on paper. Your parents or a relative loan you funds, you sign an agreement documenting the terms, and you use that money toward your deposit. The lender assesses your application knowing the funds need to be repaid, which changes how they calculate your borrowing capacity. For SAPOL officers juggling shift work and trying to save a deposit while renting, it can feel like a practical middle ground between accepting a gift and going it alone. Whether it actually makes your application stronger depends on how the agreement is written, how much you are borrowing from family, and what the lender's credit policy says about non-bank debt.

How Lenders Treat Family Loans Differently to Gifts

A gift does not need to be repaid, so lenders ignore it when calculating your ongoing commitments. A family loan does need to be repaid, so most lenders will either add a notional monthly repayment to your existing liabilities or reduce the amount they are willing to lend you. If the agreement specifies monthly repayments of $500, that $500 gets added to your car loan, credit cards, and any other debt when the lender runs your servicing. If the agreement says the loan is interest-free and repayable on sale of the property, some lenders will apply a haircut to your borrowing capacity instead of a monthly liability. Either way, your serviceability takes a hit compared to receiving the same amount as a gift.

Consider a senior constable applying for a loan with a family loan agreement in place for $40,000. The agreement states the loan is repayable at $300 per month over ten years. That $300 per month reduces borrowing capacity by around $60,000 to $70,000 depending on the lender's assessment rate. If the same $40,000 had been gifted with a signed statutory declaration, the officer's borrowing capacity would have remained unchanged. The family loan agreement creates a documented liability that works against you in the application, even though the repayment obligation to family might feel more flexible than a bank commitment.

When a Family Loan Agreement Actually Makes Sense

Family loan agreements work when your family member is not in a position to gift the funds outright, or when there are estate planning or tax reasons for structuring the arrangement as a loan. They also make sense when the loan amount is small enough that the servicing impact does not push you outside your target borrowing range. If you are borrowing $15,000 from a parent and the agreement specifies repayment only on sale, and your income comfortably services the mortgage amount you need, the structure can satisfy both the lender's documentation requirements and your family's preference for a formal arrangement.

In our experience, family loan agreements become problematic when they are used to paper over a serviceability issue that a gift would have solved cleanly. If you need the funds to reach a 10% deposit and avoid Lenders Mortgage Insurance but your income is already stretched, adding a liability to your application can backfire. Some officers assume the agreement makes the arrangement look more legitimate to the lender, but lenders care about your ability to meet all repayments, not the formality of the paperwork. A gift with a statutory declaration is often the cleaner path if your family can support it.

What the Agreement Must Include to Satisfy a Lender

Lenders will not accept a handshake or an email thread. The family loan agreement needs to be a written document signed by both parties, stating the loan amount, the repayment terms, the interest rate if any, and the security if applicable. Most lenders also want to see evidence that the funds have been transferred from the family member's account to yours, and a signed declaration from the lender confirming they understand the loan will rank behind the mortgage. If the agreement is vague or missing key terms, the lender will either ask for a rewrite or treat the funds as unexplained, which can stall or sink your application.

An agreement that says "repayable when able" or "no fixed term" will usually be treated as an ongoing liability with a notional repayment calculated by the lender. If you want control over how the loan is assessed, specify the term and the monthly repayment amount, or state clearly that repayment is deferred until sale of the property. The second option typically results in a reduction to your maximum borrowing amount rather than an increase to your monthly commitments, which can be the lesser of two evils depending on your income and the size of the mortgage you need.

Family Loan Agreements and LMI Waivers for SAPOL Officers

SAPOL officers have access to LMI waivers at higher loan-to-value ratios through certain lenders, which can reduce the amount you need to borrow from family in the first place. If you can get to a 10% genuine savings position without a family loan, you can often borrow up to 90% of the property value without paying LMI. Once you cross into family loan territory, you need to confirm whether the lender offering the LMI waiver will still approve your application with the additional liability on your servicing. Not all lenders that waive LMI for police will accept family loan agreements, and those that do may reduce the maximum LVR they are willing to lend at.

The distinction matters if you are buying in Adelaide's inner southern suburbs or around Prospect, where entry-level properties still require a deposit that sits just outside what you have saved. Borrowing $20,000 from family under a loan agreement might get you to the 10% deposit mark, but if that loan reduces your borrowing capacity by $50,000, you may end up unable to afford the property you were targeting. Running the numbers with a broker before signing the family loan agreement is the only way to know whether the structure helps or hinders your application.

Genuine Savings Requirements and Family Loans

Funds received under a family loan agreement are not counted as genuine savings. Lenders define genuine savings as funds you have accumulated over at least three months through your own income, and a family loan does not meet that test regardless of how it is documented. If a lender requires you to have 5% genuine savings to approve a 90% LVR loan, the family loan can top up your deposit beyond that 5%, but it cannot replace the genuine savings component. This catches some applicants off guard, particularly those who assume a family loan agreement is interchangeable with their own savings because it involves a formal repayment structure.

For SAPOL officers working to build a deposit while managing the cost of rent and irregular overtime, this means the family loan agreement is a supplement, not a shortcut. You still need to demonstrate that you have saved a portion of the deposit yourself over time. If that is not realistic in your situation, a guarantor loan may be a more effective structure, as it allows a family member to use their property as security without requiring you to hold savings or borrow funds separately.

The Tax and Estate Planning Side

Family loan agreements can have implications for the person lending you the money, particularly if the loan is interest-bearing or if they pass away before it is repaid. If your parents charge you interest on the family loan, that interest may be assessable income for them and need to be declared on their tax return. If the loan is interest-free and sits on their estate when they die, it may be treated as an asset and divided according to their will, which can create tension if you have siblings or other beneficiaries expecting an equal share. These are not lending issues, but they are worth discussing with your family before signing anything, particularly if the loan amount is substantial or the repayment term is long.

Some families prefer the loan structure precisely because it keeps the transaction separate from an early inheritance, but the agreement needs to reflect that intent clearly. If the goal is to avoid an argument down the line, the document should specify what happens if the lender dies, whether the loan can be forgiven in the will, and how repayment is calculated if the property is sold. Your broker is not going to ask those questions, but your family solicitor should.

Alternatives That Might Work Better

If your family is willing to help but a loan agreement feels like it is creating more problems than it solves, there are other structures worth comparing. A guarantor arrangement lets your parents use equity in their property to support your application without handing over cash, and without adding a liability to your servicing. A gift with a signed statutory declaration is cleaner from a lending perspective and does not reduce your borrowing capacity. If your family member wants some security or formality around the arrangement, you can still document a private agreement between yourselves without involving the lender, though that comes with its own risks if expectations are not aligned.

Each structure suits a different situation, and the right one depends on how much your family can help, whether they need the funds returned, and how much borrowing capacity you can afford to lose. The family loan agreement is not inherently good or bad, but it is not a neutral option either. It changes your application in ways that can limit your choices, and it is worth understanding those limits before you commit.

If you are weighing up how to structure family assistance or whether a family loan agreement will work with your income and the property you are looking at, call one of our team or book an appointment at a time that works for you. We will run the scenarios with lenders who understand shift work and SAPOL income, and show you what each option does to your borrowing capacity before you sign anything.

Frequently Asked Questions